I'm good at CSS. But I still often like to set up a layout with a big simple table to allow resizable 'rubber band' type layout.
The DIV code to allow this sort of flexible layout just seems clunkier to me than using a nice simple table. I don't use nested tables, so I don't think I'm suffering in terms of SEO.
It seems you should use the tool for the job. For things that are accurate, detailed and typographic, CSS is the tool. For things that are 'boxy' and tabular, tables seem like the right way to go.
Change
12 replies to this topic
#1
OFFLINE
Posted 26 June 2011 - 12:48 AM
OFFLINE
#2
OFFLINE
Posted 26 June 2011 - 12:57 AM
OFFLINE
#3
OFFLINE
Posted 26 June 2011 - 05:58 AM
OFFLINE
Quote
... It seems you should use the tool for the job...
#4
OFFLINE
Posted 26 June 2011 - 11:22 AM
OFFLINE
Div can do the same thing as tables and then some, whoch is why I prefer too use that instead of tables.
#5
OFFLINE
Posted 26 June 2011 - 11:49 AM
OFFLINE
Quote
I'm good at CSS. But I still often like to set up a layout with a big simple table to allow resizable 'rubber band' type layout.
The DIV code to allow this sort of flexible layout just seems clunkier to me than using a nice simple table. I don't use nested tables, so I don't think I'm suffering in terms of SEO.
It seems you should use the tool for the job. For things that are accurate, detailed and typographic, CSS is the tool. For things that are 'boxy' and tabular, tables seem like the right way to go.
#6
OFFLINE
Posted 26 June 2011 - 04:51 PM
OFFLINE
#7
OFFLINE
Posted 29 June 2011 - 04:13 PM
OFFLINE
We need a "Like" button so facebook can sue us.... Anyways, I would click Lordrach's answer if we had one... LOL
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 30 June 2011 - 12:33 PM
OFFLINE
lol thx :p btw I think that using facebook API would be a great idea to promote the community on Facebook, you can integrate the like and share functionality on the fly
#9
OFFLINE
Posted 20 July 2011 - 12:22 AM
OFFLINE
Yeah, I agree with HCN-SeriesN. But also it's quite tricky to set a div, because of browsers compatibility.
#10
OFFLINE
Posted 14 August 2011 - 10:38 AM
OFFLINE
if a div setup is done correctly then you shouldnt run into problems it just takes time to do. i personally like divs over tables. i have used both and find a div layout alot better. but its up to you both types have pro's and con's. both are able to be set to percentages not fixed width.
easy way to decide flip a coin. haha thats how i usually do it or like SeriesN suggested use both!
easy way to decide flip a coin. haha thats how i usually do it or like SeriesN suggested use both!
#11
OFFLINE
Posted 20 August 2011 - 08:29 AM
OFFLINE
The old days tables huh. I thought they were gone for good as far as website layouts are concerned. But I'm both shocked and impressed to see them still in existence. Anyway, I thought div was to replace tables in layout.
Div tag is more flexible and useful than tables. For me I like using them.
Div tag is more flexible and useful than tables. For me I like using them.
#12
OFFLINE
Posted 15 September 2011 - 08:02 PM
OFFLINE
Div is better in Layout construction and Table is best in Content or Data Arrangement...
#13
OFFLINE
Posted 01 October 2011 - 01:21 PM
OFFLINE
tables are actually a hack of html code that people use for layouts. Divs were designed for layouts.





This topic is locked
Back to top











